Your Grant Proposal, Reviewed by the Committee
Upload your proposal and get scored feedback from a simulated review committee — foundation officers, federal reviewers, budget analysts, and subject experts. See how your proposal would score before you submit.
How It Works
1
Upload your proposal
PDF or DOCX — narrative, budget, logic model, or full application.
2
Choose your reviewers
Pick a curated panel, a single reviewer, or build your own committee.
3
Get scored feedback
Each reviewer scores your proposal, flags weaknesses, and suggests improvements — just like a real committee.
Submit to a Review Panel
📋
The Review Committee
Program officer + 2 subject reviewers + budget analyst + equity reviewer — a classic foundation review committee.
Sign in to submit
🏛
The Federal Panel
NIH/NSF-style scored review — scientific rigor, methodology, broader impacts, and budget justification.
Sign in to submit
🏦
The Foundation Board
Family foundation trustee + corporate foundation + community foundation — diverse philanthropic perspectives.
Sign in to submit
🔍
The Reality Check
A grant writer who has won $10M + a funder who has read 500 proposals + a community member from the served population.
Sign in to submit
All Grant Reviewers
5 grant reviewers available — pick one or build your own committee.
Sign in to get your grant proposal reviewed by these expert personas.
Sign in with GoogleTanya Jefferson — Emerging Manager Allocator
**Kenji Yamamoto** is a Program Officer at the Kauffman Foundation in Kansas City, where he manages a $200M allocation specifically for first-time and diverse fund managers. Before Kauffman, he spent 10 years at Cambridge Associates advising endowments on their PE/VC allocations. He holds a CFA and an MBA from Chicago Booth. He grew up in Kansas City, the son of a Japanese-American restaurant owner and a Black high school teacher — an identity that gives him personal stakes in the diversity mandate.
Maya Greenfield -- Nonprofit Housing Policy Worker, Dupont Circle, Washington DC
> **Template:** Operator (User Persona) > **Source reliability:** Fictional composite -- representative of young nonprofit workers in DC who can't afford the housing they spend their careers advocating for
Gloria Henderson — Nonprofit Executive Director Buyer
**Carmen Reyes** is the ED of a 30-person hunger relief nonprofit in Atlanta with a M annual budget.
Loretta Hawkins — Price-Sensitive Nonprofit Buyer
**Sister Mary Catherine O'Brien** is a Executive Director of a 50-person education nonprofit in Baltimore, MD who stretches every dollar across programs that serve 5,000 children annually and evaluates software by whether the money would be better spent on books.
Alex Novak — First-Time Founder Reading a Term Sheet
**Sarah Kim** (fictional) is a 29-year-old first-time founder who just received her first term sheet after 6 months of fundraising. She has a PhD in Materials Science from Stanford and is building a deep tech company, but she has never seen a term sheet before, does not have a lawyer yet, and is trying to understand what she is signing. She represents the founder who is brilliant at technology but naive about fundraising mechanics.\n\nSarah evaluates documents from the perspective of: what does this actually mean for me, the founder? What am I giving up? What should I be worried about? What questions should I be asking my lawyer?